Welcome to Barcelona Annual Meeting

by Felipe Criado-Boado, EAA President, on the behalf of EAA Executive Board, Committees and Communities (president@e-a-a.org)

This is the full version of my speech in the Opening Ceremony of Barcelona Annual Meeting September 5, 2018. I am reproducing it here because it is the best summary of the most important recent developments on the EAA and also a good text to launch the 25th Anniversary of the EAA that we will celebrate in 2019. When being next year in Bern (Switzerland) EAA will be just 25 years old.

Dear members, dear colleagues, dear friends, welcome everybody to Barcelona, the 24th AM of the EAA. Benvinguts, bienvenidos. My welcome words this year will be a bit special. I will tell later why they are special.

Details about the AM and thanks

We must start by remembering those colleagues and friends who have passed away this year. The joy of gathering once again this year is mixed with sadness because we have missed some treasured members. I mention Vito Polcaro, Asle Olsen, Ericka Engelstad, Johanna Stöger (former Editorial Board member), and Henry Cleere. All of them were commemorated in our webpage. Henry will be remembered as one of the founding members of the EAA and one of those that worked tirelessly during the early years and later development of the EAA – from 1994 to 2018. In our hearts and minds, we carry Henry and those others that we have missed who were so instrumental in crafting the unique collegial character of EAA especially in the lead into our 25th anniversary year.

The last 24 years have led us here, to Barcelona. The best tribute we can now pay to Henry and our other deceased colleagues is the popularity and size of this gathering; we are here 2987 participants this year. The figures for this Barcelona AM are really extraordinary. 259 sessions, 3004 presentations plus 175 posters, 2987 registered attendees. EAA altogether is now 3429 members.

This figure is all the more significant because you have all come here in spite of all the news and uncertainty during the year about Barcelona and Catalunya. When many other were staying away, we all decided to come. This says a lot about EAA. It says a lot about the quality of the organisation here.

It is my pleasure therefore to take the opportunity here to thank all the organisations that have cooperated and sponsored this AM, moltes gràcies. They have been represented here by our previous speakers: the Catalan Autonomous Government, represented by its Minister of Culture, Laura Borrás; the Barcelona City Council, represented by the its Commissioner for Culture, Joan Subirats; the University of Barcelona, represented by its Chancellor, Joan Elías; the People´s Cathedral of Santa María del Mar, represented by its dean David Abadías.

Being here, in this wonderful venue of Santa María del Mar, makes a lot of sense. It was known since Medieval times as the “cathedral of the People”, the counterpart of the formal bourgeoisie cathedral of the Barcelona. This says something about the feeling of being here, because it reminds us of what iglesia in Spanish, ecclesia in Latin, ekklesia in Greek, in fact means: it means assembly of people. Where we are is actually what we are, a “thing/ting” in Old English and Nordic (with echoes to our archaeological practice, an etymology that should be taken into account for those who speak about the Ontological Turn, and those who understand Archaeology as the discipline of the Things), i.e. an assembly of people, who gather for its annual meeting to reflect about our future through our pasts.

Being so many this year, also says a lot about the excellent job done by our local host organization, our principle organizer Marga Díaz-Andreu together with Sandra Montón and Raquel Piqué. We warmly thank them for the tremendous job they have done side by side with the supporting organization provided by Antoni Nicolau, María José Gallego and Mónica Mackay.

Finally, it validates the newly developed model of EAA AM organisation. This is the first meeting where the EAA and our Secretariat have taken a central role. It has been a challenge and has involved enormous effort. The preliminary results, however, are promising. You cannot easily imagine the breath and scale of the professional development that our Secretariat has undergone, while always maintaining their personal friendliness and always helpful service to members. But I am sure that you all have a clear idea that the soul of the EAA is embodied in our Secretariat and is carried forward by our Secretariat staff.

In the end, you will be the judges of the final result. You may bear in mind that we have had to craft clear financial priorities in order to get the best from your registration fee income and from the donations of our sponsors. We have been very austere trying to do more with less. We are delighted that the quality of the academic program is so high and looks amazing. With a lot of effort and a reasonable budget we have managed to put together a complex and highly diverse AM. It is indeed huge and, for some, it may be too complex with too many sessions at the same time. But EAA seeks to be inclusive and this means that we have sought to cater for the requirements of our growing and diverse membership. Let me say that this is perhaps a price we must pay for inclusivity - and for being a dynamic and plural organisation where nobody with basic quality is left over, where we all have chances to meet and learn from each other’s very distinct experiences.

New developments – things to foster and keep for the future

There is a lot going on in the next days, and some of the events are new. We have adopted a safer space policy for the first time that we will keep for the future. We will give zero-tolerance to any case of personal exclusion or aggression with special attention to gender and sexual harassment. We ask you please, if anything of this kind happens, to refer the matter to anyone in the organisation. If necessary, even come to me.

Press coverage will be pretty big. A team from Spanish TV will be here throughout the AM, recording material for the production of a set of nine documentary films. A social media strategy has been devised that will also promote digital interaction and visibility (report included in this TEA issue). We have an open Photo call and you all are invited to share your photos there.

For the first time, the AM exhibition is organised as The European Archaeology Fair (EAF). This year it brings 41 exhibitors. I take this occasion to urge you all to consider using the fair as a platform to present your projects/work/research/teaching and business to your colleagues and the public. We hope the EAF will also be a focus for networking and social and intellectual interaction, not only for commercial and private business. The EAA Board is considering discounts to stable members of the EAA since the “Fair” is also an important service that EAA builds for our members.

As part of our desire to ensure public engagement and Citizen Science, as last year in the memorable Maastricht meeting, a full program of community and social activities has been scheduled for this year’s AM, under the title Arqueologia al carrer, archaeology in the street. Thanks must be given go Isidre Pastor and Laura Coltofean for their contribution to these activities.

This year is, of course, the European Year of Cultural Heritage. We will adopt a statement about the European Year of Cultural Heritage and Archaeology.

We are very happy to welcome a special delegation of the World Bank. The delegation has come to present their new guidelines for cultural and social risk assessment in relation to development funded by the World Bank investment.

We will also hold a President's Forum, as we did in Vilnius. These open sessions offer opportunity for reflection on urgent matters, At Vilnius it was the potential impact of the Brexit referendum. This year it will be devoted to International Cooperation in Archaeology and Heritage and the World Bank’s Engagement in Cultural Heritage Management.

This year we will sign Memorandums of Understanding with CAA and DGUF, to foster special cooperation as we already do with, WAC, SAA, CIfA, SAfA.

We will celebrate a meeting with our Corporate Members and welcome the Prehistoric Society, the Institute of Pre- and Protohistoric Archaeology in Kiel, and Salisbury Archaeology as our new corporate members. I am happy to take this occasion to acknowledge their crucial support of the EAA over the years, and I aim to ensure that we promote their engagement in the life of the EAA.

We thank the private Foundation PALARQ for the generous donation they have given to us this year that we have used to support young members of EAA. In 2018 under their private patronage they are launching the National Archaeology and Paleontology Award rewarding the best Spanish project and team; the call for the prize is starting on September 10th and the final decision will be taken by an international Jury in November https://fundacionpalarq.com/premio/).

On Wednesday Sept 5, we held the working lunch with presidents and representatives of the 21 archaeological associations present in here, perhaps representing between all of them about 17,000 individual members; this year we focused on “the new skills we need” and the discussion was good; the output from this meeting is published in this issue of TEA.

Also this morning we held a special meeting of representatives of all the EAA Communities and Committees with the aim of promoting their activity and presence in the EAA life; this will be a special task for the Executive Board in the year ahead.

Quick balance

Next year, your Executive Board, EAA officers, EAA staff and I will implement new initiatives that reflect the strategic development in our organisation and place these within the EAA Statutes and Handbooks.

It will be a lot of work. The past three years have also been characterized by a lot of developmental work. But no work is sufficient to respond to enormous and continuing impetus that the EAA has. This is a very special organisation. You all make it special.

Ten months ago (November 2017), when Spain, Catalunya and Europe were worried about events here, in Barcelona, when many companies left the city and important international congresses considered the possibility of cancelling, our membership showed their trust, support and interest in our Annual Meetings and reacted by offering the highest level of participation in the history of the EAA. This response from our members fills us all with great pride in the EAA: it says something about the type of organisation we are, the type of values we endorse, and the type of work we do, even when these may have different meanings for each of us.

The multivocal soul of the EAA

But now I come to the most special part of my speech. I will tell you in a while why is special and I am sure you will appreciate.

“Spending time and energy on archaeology may seem hopeless in present day Europe, torn by exit and Brexit, refugee flows, and alternative facts. However, the very same issues make this work more important than ever because Archaeology is all about our collective past, present and future. Dealing with archaeology can be a way to bring marginalized groups into history, and the EAA has a key role in this process. We should especially focus on equality and diversity in archaeology and particularly within the EAA. …

We have to enable a greater integration of the Palaeolithic, Mesolithic and Classics communities at the EAA and in AMs, which are still underrepresented. We must also advocate for an increased engagement of the EAA in climate and global change. These issues are deeply connected with questions of social justice, equality and cultural integrity in its broadest sense. These are the values we must promote. …

We must increase the participation of graduate students and early career researchers in the EAA. In addition, we must work for connecting South and North, West and East (including the Near East, Gulf region, Africa and Asia), and different traditions and generations of archaeologists. It is now more important than ever to maintain European cooperation and strengthen transnational networks in times of Brexit, new borders, nationalist, exclusivist isolationism and rising fascism. The EAA is an ideal platform to promote cooperation, shared values and knowledge within Europe and beyond. …

The current European context requires associations like ours that are ready to reaffirm perspectives of transnational (and trans-European) collaboration. In this historical moment there is a need to create alliances and seek collaboration widely. Otherwise, our discipline will be condemned to irrelevance. …

EAA is a valuable asset in the archaeological and heritage arenas. There are several reasons for this: one is that our membership base is impressive. EAA is a place where we all come together as equals. …

The EAA needs people who come prepared to work, but it also requires and environment that ensures that all members can participate fully in the life of the association. Thus, we must give voice to the objectivity and merit-based decisions for the good future of the EAA and to ensure the equality and transparency for the trust of our members. …

Good ideas and intentions are not the only factors that determine results. People and their efforts do. "Start by doing what is necessary, then what is possible, and suddenly you are doing the impossible" (Francis of Assisi)". It is an honour for me to be a part of this great endeavour.”

What makes these words special is that they are not my words. I only made them mine. These words are caught from all the election statements of this year nine candidates to the different positions we are voting. Better than anything else, they speak about the shared soul of the EAA. To merge them is true multivocality. I am not referring here to multivocality as a liberal version of political correctness: multivocality is not to hear multiple voices speaking to us. This is just democracy. Multivocality is different voices speaking us. It is not only a matter of hearing but mainly a matter of being spoken. Truly, our culture needs to overcome a reluctant paradigm of strong individuality that is being reinforced by the extreme competition that more and more become nowadays customary in science and professional careers. Speaking other voices really helps to create a wider shared field for action.

EAA getting 25

In a year from now, EAA will be 25 years old. From this very instant, the Executive Board calls all of you to use this opportunity, to reflect on the future, and how Archaeology and EAA can be relevant and helpful. To get the sense of how important this anniversary year will be, let me quickly recall some important events that are celebrated in 2018 in 2019. Anniversaries are folds in spacetime.

2018 is the 200th anniversary of Marx. It is also the 50 anniversary of May '68. Amidst our present troubles, it is a good moment to ask if the utopias that one day our society envisaged have come true. And I am afraid that the answer is NO. I was very young in '68. But I remember how the thirst for renewal transpired in the atmosphere; that was even visible in a provincial town of the grey Francoist Spain. The following 50 years have brought us development and welfare. But they have also made stronger and more visible some of the forms of domination that Marx and the '68 had identified. I will not say we are worse. But that is simply because we now know more, and among the things we know, we know why those utopias failed. One of the main reasons they failed was because the total absence of a gender perspectivism, because the maintenance of a reluctant male-chauvinism, and because they did not question gender relations and the basic form of domination that emerges in them, … perhaps because sexual liberation was not a liberation of bodies, but namely of the body of men. There was some other reasons: because the necessary criticism of the Enlightenment led to irrationality; because the critique of functionalist positivism consolidated a simply individualistic relativism, the most beneficial for a system that requires consumers; because this subjectivism forgot something as basic as that reason is subjectively constituted, but the subjectivity is not the reason; because it was not possible to offer an alternative to the great superpower of capitalism that is the capacity to integrate every movement and deviation; because they forgot the main lesson that Foucault gave soon after the 68, the lesson of a constructive nihilism, i.e. "that only speak of revolution those who are ready to risk their lives for doing it" (at 1970, in The Order of Discourse).

2019 is the 100th anniversary of the Dyson-Eddington-Davidson experiment that first tested the Einstein's General Theory of Relativity, the 50th anniversary of the first moon landing, and the EAA's own 25th anniversary. At that time, we will be in Bern, the town where Einstein published his major papers in 1905, to celebrate EAA AM, and we will join it with the 27th annual conference of the European Society for Astronomy in Culture (SEAC) that will be celebrated embedded with our own meeting. These coincidences are extremely appropriate occasion to reflect on what our real contribution from Archaeology and Archaeological Heritage has been and can be, for a future in which everything that seemed solid in 1994 has melted away under the pressing threats that challenge an inclusive and progressive idea of Europe.

Celebrating EAA Anniversary

To commemorate EAA 25 Years, we would like to particularly encourage all our members to propose sessions relevant to the main themes of the Annual Meeting that include the “EAA 25” label in their title. These sessions should offer a unique opportunity to evaluate what has been the contribution of the EAA to the proposed topic throughout its 25 years’ history, not only with regard to developments in the field, but also with regard to prospects and challenges for the future. We particularly welcome session proposals that reflect on the socio-political dimensions of archaeological knowledge and heritage, in order to facilitate the realignment of accepted practice with current problems and future requirements.

The challenge for us all is to use this very special occasion to think how Archaeology deconstructs the entanglement between everything that made us, to explore Archaeology´s ability to face the big issues. The Bern´s motto, Beyond Paradigms, remembers that, if paradigms become like the mountains, barriers that enclose our lives and experiences, thinking beyond the sets of theoretical barriers we have constructed will enable us to discover the fissures in these paradigms that, like the passes through the Swiss mountains, foster interaction and convergence. The Barcelona´s EAA motto, Reflecting Futures, remember us that Archaeology is all about the future because archaeologists superpower is to learn how the future came into being. In this sense, we archaeologists are magic. Archaeology has got the magic to reflect about how the future came into existence, and thus has got the magic to think about the future. Our main task should be to apply this magic in our daily work, and use it for the benefit of our profession and our societies. Instead of thinking about the solution to today's problems since yesterday, we have to think about the solutions of tomorrow from the day after tomorrow, using our capacity to know the retro-futures. This is what means reflecting futures and thinking beyond paradigms, an ability to envisage solutions by acknowledging that Archaeology is not a step back but a step forwards.

Therefore, since Archaeology is capable of searching the fold where the future pasts and present futures meet, is Archaeology not capable of mobilising a transformative understanding of our societies in times as complicated as these? The Opening Ceremony of Barcelona AM was also the first day of my second term. Thus today I renew my commitment to serve you all in the best way I can. Three years ago I finished my first letter to members by telling “many of us have faced up to challenges in the past because we wanted things to change. But now we need to be more realistic; we face up to challenges because things will not change. Things do not change by themselves. Things compel us: they require our absence in order to remain as they are; and they require our presence to become something new.” This rock song says this simpler and better: “the world is not going to change itself. That´s up to you” (Unfuck the World, Prophets of Rage, 2017).

Benvinguts and Moltes gràcies for being here.


Opening Ceremony took place in Santa Mara del Mar. Photo Alejandro García

Go back to top

The 24th European Association of Archaeologists Annual Meeting (EAAAM), Barcelona 5-8 September 2018

by Margarita Díaz-Andreu (m.diaz-andreu@ub.edu)

The 24th European Association of Archaeologists Annual Meeting (EAAAM), held in Barcelona from 5th to 8th September 2018, was the largest in the history of the Association. With 260 sessions and almost 3,000 presentations (174 of them in poster form), organisation of the meeting represented a challenge that, many have told us, was successfully met. The challenge was double, in that 2018 also was the first year that a new model for the organisation of the EAAAMs was introduced. With the objective of offering continuity to the EAAAM from year to year, stability in the organisational design, and control over the financing of the event, the EAA Secretariat in Prague has become a central player in the organisation of the meetings. From now on, the EAA Secretariat will maintain and update the EAAAM website, maintain congress registrations and membership applications, while also receiving proposals for sessions and papers. The main organising institution and its partners will be in charge of everything else, covering both logistic and scientific aspects. In 2018, the main organising institution was the University of Barcelona (UB), having the support and cooperation of the Pompeu Fabra University (UPF), and the Autonomous University of Barcelona (UAB). This was reflected in the three-headed local organising committee formed by Margarita Díaz-Andreu (UB, ICREA ), Sandra Montón (UPF, ICREA) and Raquel Piqué (UAB). They were also supported by two firms, Manners and Kultura and by an Advisory Board of almost thirty representatives from all sectors of Catalan archaeology: administration, research centres, museums, the private sector and universities. During the meeting, a group of really helpful student volunteers coming from every part of Europe were essential for the effective running of the conference

"Reflecting Futures” was the chosen motto to denote the transmission of knowledge that takes place during EAA conferences, where existing wisdom produces new knowledge that both reflects the past and forms the basis on which the future is crafted. For the logo, three female figures from the Roca dels Moros rock art shelter of Cogul were selected , each coloured in a different tonality of blue alluding to Barcelona’s Mediterranean character. The scientific committee decided on six themes to centre debates. The most popular ones in terms of sessions and papers were those with a wide-ranging formulation, the first one on "theory and method" and the second on "cultural material, bodies and landscapes". Both attracted more than two thirds of the whole number of sessions. It should be said that the distinction between both was not as clear-cut as it perhaps would have been a couple of decades ago, at the height of the processual and later post-processual debates. The submissions showed that explicit theoretical discussions seem to be rapidly disappearing among the new generations, the exception being, in the first theme, a couple of sessions in which entanglement was mentioned, and others dealing with the crisis of ideas and models. Most scholars, in contrast, are beguiled by the many methodologies being employed in archaeology to discover new aspects of the past. These include some relatively new approaches such as isotopes and genetics, along with others that already have seen years of use but continue to bear fruit: remote sensing, GIS, palynology, metallurgy, osteology and so on. There was some interest in new fields such as Big Data, health, and disaster-led archaeology. The most successful sessions were on computational models in archaeology; archaeology and climate change; excavating archives; and coastal and maritime archaeology.

The second theme on “The archaeology of material culture, bodies and landscapes” had, as mentioned, a high degree of overlap with the first one. Nevertheless, on the one hand sessions in theme 2 usually focused either on a particular period, mainly prehistory and medieval archaeology or any of its subdivisions, or a particular region; and on the other hand, social and economic questions to address at the session tended to be more explicitly put forward. There was also a higher number of sessions mentioning a series of abstract concepts such as agency, posthumanism, magic, and relationality. There were also discussions on more mundane issues such as storage, wild-plant crafts, a wide range of objects – pottery, lithics, metals, beads and so on – and architecture. Other topics comprised matters such as water, climate and boundaries. The majority of the most popular sessions were within theme 2 and dealt with identity; human-made environments; grave-good biographies; building store-structures in Neolithic Europe; approaches to medieval buildings; textiles in ancient iconography; animal representations in the past; lithics as territorial markers; ecclesiastical landscapes; archaeoacoustics; art as material culture; beakers; and European hillforts. Themes 3-6 accounted for the last third of sessions. Theme 4 on Archaeology and the future of cities and urban landscapes held one of the other most popular sessions on archaeology and unsustainable urban growth. It should be noted that, in comparison with previous years, the EAAAM 2018 the number of heritage sessions was low, something that can be easily explained because of the unfortunate coincidence of dates with the meeting of the Association of Critical Heritage Studies Group in China. A theme of marine landscapes and another one on museums completed the palimpsest; for the latter, this was the first time that the EAA had included a theme on this topic, and it attracted a discrete but important number of sessions.

Keynote lectures were held after the sessions at the end of each day (with one exception) and covered a range of topics including the very relevant subject (as seen above) on whether archaeology needs archaeological theory given that it has methods. Other lectures dealt with social landscapes; Neolithic clayscapes; food in archaeology; and archaeology in the Anthropocene. The last set of keynote speakers reflected on heritage and archaeology today and dealt with conflict and politics in archaeology; decolonising African archaeology; Europe’s role in rescuing archaeology; the relevance of heritage (with an emphasis on World Heritage); and archaeology and communication through storytelling, story creation and sharing. A final keynote lecture was about the European Research Council. The speakers were chosen under various criteria that included their gender (to achieve the parity that is so crucial for setting an example and a benchmark for future archaeology professionals) and geographic, linguistic and thematic distribution.

In addition to dedicating a whole theme to Archaeology and the European Year of Cultural Heritage, a public archaeology programme for citizen science called “Arqueologia al Carrer” was developed. It included activities such as historical re-enactment groups, live experimental archaeology exhibitions, a heritage walk, a film cycle at the filmoteque, a cycle of talks in a series of neighbourhood libraries, and two open days of the historical 19th century factory remains in the Faculty of Geography and History.

I believe that many delegates will remember for many years the Barcelona 2018 social events , including a fantastic party on Thursday at the Razzmattazz nightclub with the Catalan "Sabor de Gràcia" rumba group. On Friday, MERC had its party and the conference was crowned on Saturday with an excellent supper (the Annual Dinner) at the Drassanes Reials (Royal Shipyards) of Barcelona attended by 400 delegates.

Social media played an especially important role in this annual meeting. The twitter account reached 814 followers and 369,000 views in the days before, during and after the conference and the Facebook account had 1,081 followers and approximately 10,000 visits since 4 September (data from the EAA Secretariat on 13 September). More than 30 news items on TV, radio and in the printed press covered the EAAAM.

Overall, the local organising committee was very pleased with the results of the Annual Meeting. We have received many congratulatory comments and emails expressing a general feeling of satisfaction, with laudatory remarks on how smoothly everything ran despite the numbers and the practical difficulties, such as torrential rain on the first evening. More importantly, the atmosphere was relaxed enough to allow an easy exchange of ideas and proposals among the participants. EAA Barcelona 2018 is now past, but we believe that the future was crafted during the days the EAA delegates joined in Barcelona. Reflecting futures.

Go back to top

And we managed to be a Trending Topic… #EAA2018

by Jaime Almansa Sánchez (jaime.almansa-sanchez@incipit.csic.es) and Alejandra Linares Figueruelo

Social Media Team #EAA2018

Last August we encouraged you to use social media and try making archaeology Trending Topic in Barcelona during the Annual Meeting. This answered to a pilot experience to implement a clearer policy for Social Media and Communication within the EAA. Dealing with such a large conference was complicated and so, we would like to start acknowledging all the parties involved for their help, especially the volunteers. After all, we managed to become Trending Topic on Twitter for some hours even though there were many other things going on. Twitter was the focus for these days, as we were shorthanded to curate Facebook too in an appropriate manner. However, data has shown good in both.

Delving into the numbers would take too many words, so we would like to use this short report to share some of the highlights:

On Facebook, users grew a 30% during the conference and the over 450 photos shared reached more than 9,000 people with a high interaction rate.

On Twitter, @EAA2018 published almost 1,200 posts those days. Another 2,144 users posted under #EAA2018 over 7,200 times. Regarding the sessions, 42 were inactive, 50 highly active, and there was an average of 24 tweets per session. The average reach per day of our account was over 50,000 people, also with a high interaction rate.

You can get a glimpse of the magnitude with this interactive model produced from Hawksey TAGS: https://hawksey.info/tagsexplorer/?key=1bm-TnZQDeV9Ff-wTPXtSMk7hEWnol5cscGdSDjtvZXM&gid=400689247

We believe social media offered a great platform for communication during the Annual Meeting. We served as an information channel pointing out everything happening and where to find it, while attendees engaged in a way other colleagues were able to know more details. As a mean of comparison #archaeology barely doubled our numbers worldwide, being #EAA2018 in many of the posts too. So the Annual Meeting represented a high percentage of the archaeology taking place on Twitter that week. Furthermore, some of the sessions had a parallel (and high) impact by themselves. Session #s698 on climate change was one of them, but especially session #s744 from where the campaign against sexual harassment and violence in archaeology was coming from. They appeared in the media, and two of their hashtag reached over one thousand tweets while one of the tweets had a massive impact.

Looking to the future there are many details to polish, but maybe archaeology can become a Trending Topic in Bern next year too. Just will need you to keep engaging, enjoying, and informing. Social media have proved to be a very useful mean of communication during the Annual Meeting and that will surely provide a better service for members and prospective members from now on.



Figure: Whiteboard with the schedule of parallel events (not sessions) in the Social Media Team room during the #EAA2018 (© Jaime Almansa Sánchez)

Go back to top

Press report

The recent Annual Meeting of the EAA in Barcelona attracted significant media attention. It was mentioned in nine printed newspaper editions, including El Periódico and El Mundo, and featured in 41 online news articles. The meeting was further broadcast in five radio and TV shows. A full report of c. 100 pages was provided to the EAA executive board to help us understand the role of media interactions with the local organisation, supervised by the EAA officers, and publicising possibilities for future Annual Meetings.




Go back to top

Report of the EAA President’s Working Lunch Discussion

Barcelona, 5 September 2018
Attendance
  • Steve Davis - AARG (Aerial Archaeology Research Group) - Chair
  • Teresita Majewski - ACRA (American Cultural Resources Association) - representative
  • Niklas Hausmann - AEA (Association for Environmental Archaeology) - representative
  • Ben Thomas - AIA (Archaeological Institute of America) - Director of programmes
  • Andrew Moore - AIA (Archaeological Institute of America) - Past President
  • Isidre Pastor i Batalla - Associació d'Arqueòlegs de Catalunya
  • Tom Brughmans CAA (Computer Applications in Archaeology) - representative
  • Peter Hinton - CIfA (Chartered Institute for Archaeologists) - President
  • Lourdes Lopez - Colegio de Doctores y Licenciados de Madrid, comisión de Arqueología - Vice-President
  • Diane Scherzler - DGUF (Deutsche Gesellschaft für Ur- und Frühgeschichte) - Chair
  • Leonard de Wit - EAC (Europae Archaeological Council) - President
  • Marco Madella - EASAA (European Association for South Asian Archaeology and Art) - President
  • Adrian Olivier - ICAHM (International Scientific Committee on Archaeological Heritage Management)
  • Alicia Castillo - ICOMOS Spain - President
  • Peta Knott - Nautical Archaeology Society - Education officer
  • Ángel Astorqui - Plataforma de Empresas Culturales de Cantabria - President
  • Alex Gibson - Prehistoric Society - President
  • Susan Chandler - SAA - President
  • Tobi Brimsek - SAA - Executive Director
  • Marina Gallinaro - SAfA (Society of Africanists Archaeologists) - representative
  • Robert Tykot - SAS (Society for Archaeological Sciences) - Past President
  • Koji Mizoguchi - WAC - President
  • Marga Díaz-Andreu - 2018 AM Organiser
  • Antoni Nicolau - 2018 AM Organiser
  • Amelie Alterauge - 2019 AM Organiser
  • Felipe Criado Boado - EAA President
  • Karen Waugh - EAA Secretary
  • Maria Gurova - EAA Board member
  • Esa Mikkola - EAA Board member
  • Hrvoje Potrebica - EAA Board member
  • Alessandro Vanzetti - EAA Board member
  • Roderick B. Salisbury - EAA TEA Editor
  • Sylvie Květinová - EAA Administrator
  • Kateřina Kleinová - EAA Information and Data Administrator

The EAA President, Felipe Criado-Boado, welcomed the guests and thanked them for attending the 2018 edition of the EAA President’s Working Lunch. This annual gathering brings together the representatives of some 17,000 archaeologists to interact and consider ideas for the future. The topic for the 2018 EAA President’s Working Lunch was What new skills do archaeologists need in the changing world? In these challenging times, global archaeology requires a specific skillset, with particular emphasis on inclusion of these skills in university curricula, and the value of university degree at the archaeology job market. The response was sought in broad world context (not limited to European archaeology) and followed up the topic of the SAA President’s Breakfast What have archaeologists learned?.

"Reflecting Futures” was the chosen motto to denote the transmission of knowledge that takes place during EAA conferences, where existing wisdom produces new knowledge that both reflects the past and forms the basis on which the future is crafted. For the logo, three female figures from the Roca dels Moros rock art shelter of Cogul were selected , each coloured in a different tonality of blue alluding to Barcelona’s Mediterranean character. The scientific committee decided on six themes to centre debates. The most popular ones in terms of sessions and papers were those with a wide-ranging formulation, the first one on "theory and method" and the second on "cultural material, bodies and landscapes". Both attracted more than two thirds of the whole number of sessions. It should be said that the distinction between both was not as clear-cut as it perhaps would have been a couple of decades ago, at the height of the processual and later post-processual debates. The submissions showed that explicit theoretical discussions seem to be rapidly disappearing among the new generations, the exception being, in the first theme, a couple of sessions in which entanglement was mentioned, and others dealing with the crisis of ideas and models. Most scholars, in contrast, are beguiled by the many methodologies being employed in archaeology to discover new aspects of the past. These include some relatively new approaches such as isotopes and genetics, along with others that already have seen years of use but continue to bear fruit: remote sensing, GIS, palynology, metallurgy, osteology and so on. There was some interest in new fields such as Big Data, health, and disaster-led archaeology. The most successful sessions were on computational models in archaeology; archaeology and climate change; excavating archives; and coastal and maritime archaeology.

The questions are not only what skills are needed, but also how to get them, and why are they not being taught? The traditional requirements for today’s archaeologists seem to consist in multidisciplinarity / multitasking and communication. University departments are largely separate from each other and therefore are poorly prepared to impart the required range of skills, from factual data knowledge through economic skills, proficiency in law, ethical behaviour and communication ability, to maintain dialogue with the local community, the investors and the academic sphere. Universities should tailor MA and continuing education courses for instruction of both students and practitioners in this wide variety of non-academic skills. Students at any stage of their career must at the same time learn to be critical of what they are being taught, and must also accept being critically evaluated.

Keynote lectures were held after the sessions at the end of each day (with one exception) and covered a range of topics including the very relevant subject (as seen above) on whether archaeology needs archaeological theory given that it has methods. Other lectures dealt with social landscapes; Neolithic clayscapes; food in archaeology; and archaeology in the Anthropocene. The last set of keynote speakers reflected on heritage and archaeology today and dealt with conflict and politics in archaeology; decolonising African archaeology; Europe’s role in rescuing archaeology; the relevance of heritage (with an emphasis on World Heritage); and archaeology and communication through storytelling, story creation and sharing. A final keynote lecture was about the European Research Council. The speakers were chosen under various criteria that included their gender (to achieve the parity that is so crucial for setting an example and a benchmark for future archaeology professionals) and geographic, linguistic and thematic distribution.

Communication remains perhaps the most essential skill for engaging with the many and varied archaeological heritage stakeholders. Most academically trained archaeologists are well versed in communicating our research to each other. We may be less expert in communicating with others, particularly where listening and non-academic writing skills are required. Players in construction and infrastructure industries, for instance, wish to hear what archaeologists can do for them and how archaeology can serve their businesses. Government officials need to hear why archaeology is relevant, and why they should earmark money for archaeological research, education and heritage preservation. Narratives and examples that can be publicised in traditional and social media must aim at engaging the society. Indeed, the organisation of archaeology seems to be shifting from being state-directed to the commercial sector, and it becomes increasingly important to facilitate communication between universities, companies, state institutions and the public.

It is equally vital to listen and to receive feedback from the public and the commercial sectors on what heritage and archaeology represent to them. The NEARCH research on how Europeans think about archaeology revealed that 35% of respondents had wished to become an archaeologist, and 64% of respondents want to be involved in archaeological excavation. Hardly any other discipline has such potential, and indeed the expenditure on and coverage of archaeology in media has increased massively over the past decades. The only step missing is to let the public in and encourage and moderate its wider understanding of heritage and archaeology.

If archaeologists are not getting those vital transferrable skills, where and how should we acquire them? We might not be able to resolve the skills dilemma via the existing university system. Both cost of time in education and the fact that academic programmes are slow to react to changing needs suggest that we need to look elsewhere for a solution. To be proactive rather than reactive, we need to consider non-academic training programs as one source, while also keeping in mind that other disciplines can provide us with the skills we need. Furthermore, archaeology is very diverse. This means that on the one hand, we have some of those necessary skills distributed across the discipline, and perhaps amongst our members, but on the other hand, it means that one skill does not fit all situations or all archaeologists. We should use the skills we already have, and engage with others to bring in the missing skills. As professional associations, we can listen to our members, and help them find sources of for skills that they need, through either education or collaboration. Be the skills acquired through formal education, practice, or outsourced, archaeologists need to promote archaeology to the public and in the commercial sphere, not remain enclosed in the academic community.

Overall, the local organising committee was very pleased with the results of the Annual Meeting. We have received many congratulatory comments and emails expressing a general feeling of satisfaction, with laudatory remarks on how smoothly everything ran despite the numbers and the practical difficulties, such as torrential rain on the first evening. More importantly, the atmosphere was relaxed enough to allow an easy exchange of ideas and proposals among the participants. EAA Barcelona 2018 is now past, but we believe that the future was crafted during the days the EAA delegates joined in Barcelona. Reflecting futures.

Few disciplines put such high requirements on its practitioners – archaeology is already very transversal, and yet we ask what else we need to learn. The case may be that a mediating link is necessary between archaeologists – scientists, and the public and commercial sector. Learned / vocational associations may act as such mediators in making archaeology relevant, in bringing attention of the public to the devotion of archaeologists in their work, always taking into account the local context. We, as archaeologists and as representatives of archaeological associations, need to be more practical and need to be more inclusive in where we find our skills.

Finally, we need to be more inclusive in what we perceive our goals to be and to what purpose we deploy our skills. Although the market for archaeological labour and heritage preservation is very important to us, we also should keep in mind the potential social roles for archaeologists and archaeology. Archaeology has an inherently socio-cultural purpose, to educate, motivate and empower people. From this perspective, we need skills relevant to the human side of the discipline, for emotional intelligence, dialogue with local communities, and participatory processes.

The notes of the President’s Working Lunch will be circulated to the participants and published in the autumn issue of The European Archaeologist (TEA). Potentially, they could induce a session at a future EAA Annual Meeting or another conference.


President's Working lunch. Photo: Katka Kleinová

Go back to top

EAA Annual Report

Minutes of the Annual Membership Business Meeting – AMBM in Barcelona, 7 September 2018


AMBM, photo: Alejandro García

1. Opening and welcome

The EAA President Felipe Criado-Boado opened the meeting and welcomed the 89 EAA members present; he regretted the absence of the EAA Treasurer, Margaret Gowen Larsen, who was unable to attend for health reasons. Felipe appreciated the amount of positive energy manifested throughout the Annual Meeting and invited all members to actively engage in the life of the EAA.

2. Statement issued at the 24th EAA Annual Meeting

The EAA Executive Board shall issue a statement on the European Year of Cultural Heritage and the role played by the EAA in this aspect. This will be the first statement to be approved at an EAA Annual Meeting and is envisaged to initiate the tradition of issuing statements to enhance the impact of archaeology in society; the next statement will be prepared for the Bern Annual Meeting 2019.

3. Minutes of the previous AMBM (circulated in TEA)

The minutes of the AMBM in Maastricht 2017 were published in the TEA and there were no comments by members. The minutes were approved as correct record of the previous AMBM (0 against, 4 abstained).

4. Matters arising from the Minutes

There were no matters arising.

5. Annual Report (Felipe Criado Boado, EAA President)

An Annual report will be prepared and published for members to approve at each AMBM. The aim is to increase the accessibility and understanding of EAA matters to members. A summarised version of the AMBM approved report may then be used for fundraising and promotion purposes; members will be asked for feedback.

The full version of the President’s Opening Ceremony speech will be published in the next TEA issue.

New facilities for members include:

  • Enhanced EAA stand at EAF where members can request information or assistance, approach ExB members and access information about EAA communities.
  • Meeting with new members
  • New membership category - Young Professionals - is being defined to cater for financial constraints on members early in their career, regardless of country of residence. A proposal will be presented after an analysis has been carried out of the effect such a reduction in fees might have on EAA finances. The new membership category will be prepared for approval by members at the 2019 AMBM.
  • Membership survey is to be undertaken in the coming months – all EAA members are urged to participate.
  • ExB roles and responsibilities are being defined. Each ExB member can be contacted via a new EAA email address that reflects each role.
  • Development of EAA Secretariat is being accomplished to foster its supporting role in AM organisation.
  • The range and activities of EAA communities is increasing and all members are encouraged to subscribe to the EAA communities of their interest.
  • Recruitment of new corporate members and their engagement in EAA life is informed by yearly meetings with EAA corporate members’ representatives.

The EAA is developing its external relations and representation: Memoranda of Understanding have recently been signed with Deutsche Gesellschaft für Ur- und Frühgeschichte (DGUF), and Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology International (CAA International). The EAA is also reinforcing its relationships within Europe and outside:

  • EYCH
  • Heritage Alliance
  • Europa Nostra
  • Inside Europe: CIfA, DGUF, etc.
  • International organisations: SAfA, SAA, WAC, CAA
6. Financial Report (Krisztína Pavlíčková, EAA Financial Administrator, on behalf of Margaret Gowen Larsen, EAA Treasurer)

The audited accounts for 2017 (Fig. 1) have been presented to members. In the last 3 years, the EAA Treasurer and Financial Administrator have focused on understanding EAA economical dynamics and risks. The software and secretariat are the two most costly components of the EAA budget. Both are, however, essential for the smooth functioning of the EAA. Membership income is the basis of EAA revenues, and largely depends on Annual Meeting attendance. The category of exchange losses recorded in the accounts corresponds to the release of CZK fixation in April 2017 by the Czech National bank, resulting in a one-off accounting loss for EAA. The 2017 financial report was approved unanimously (0 abstained, 0 against). The 2017 accounting was approved unanimously (0 abstained, 0 against).

Budgetary projections for 2018 – 2019 (Fig. 2) are based on different scenarios, depending on membership numbers – this is a challenge, especially since sponsorship for Annual Meetings is increasingly difficult to secure. The software costs seem exorbitant, but include two different categories: membership and registration, and abstract handling; software costs are depreciated over 3 years. The 2018 – 2019 budget was approved unanimously (0 abstained, 0 against).

The preliminary budget of the 2018 Annual Meeting (Fig. 3) was presented for the first time for members’ reference, even if it cannot yet be approved. Members should be aware that the Barcelona Annual Meeting registration fees include 21% VAT.


Fig. 1: 2017 accounting


Fig. 2: Budget 2018 - 2019


Fig. 3: Preliminary budget of the 2018 Annual Meeting


7. Membership report and fee level for 2019 (Karen Waugh, EAA Secretary)

Comparison of EAA membership and Annual Meeting attendance (Fig. 4) shows a continuing, but fairly stable discrepancy between the two bars on the chart representing each year. The difference between the bars corresponds to members joining the EAA but not attending the Annual Meeting. Such information gives the EAA an impulse to work to retain not only members that are unable to attend Annual Meetings but also new members.


Fig. 4: Comparison of EAA membership and Annual Meeting Attendance

Membership figures per country (Fig. 5) shows that the UK, Netherlands and USA maintain stable high numbers. However, it is important to stress that the EAA is for archaeologists with an interest in European archaeology, it is not limited to EU or European countries. The EAA must continue to find ways how to become relevant to members from anywhere in the world.

Corporate membership was enlarged by 3 new members (Prehistoric Society, Salisbury Archaeology, Kiel University) and currently includes:

  • ASHA - Archaeological Service Agency
  • Association of Lithuanian Archaeology
  • AU - Institute of Archaeology of the Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic
  • HES Historic Environment Scotland
  • INRAP - National Institute for Preventive Archaeological Research
  • Institut fuer Ur- und Fruehgeschichte Kiel
  • Institute of Archaeology Russian Academy of Sciences
  • Museum of Cultural History University of Oslo
  • NIKU - Norwegian Institute for Cultural Heritage Research
  • OCENW - Cultural Heritage Inspectorate
  • Prehistoric Society

The membership fee level for 2019 remains unchanged from that of 2018 – this was approved unanimously (0 abstained, 0 against).


Fig. 5: Membership per country

8. Oscar Montelius Foundation report (Eszter Bánffy, Chair of the OMF Board of Trustees)

The OMF was primarily established to manage and invest any financial surplus generated by EAA Annual Meetings. Currently, however, EAA does not produce a sufficiently large surplus to donate to the OMF. Accordingly, the OMF has been looking into possibilities to give financial assistance to the EAA. In order to understand how OMF resources can best provide financial support for the EAA, discussions have been held and will continue to be held between the OMF Trustees, EAA Officers and Executive Board. Based on these discussions, it has been agreed that, in the short term, OMF should support EAA membership in attending Annual Meetings through travel grants, drawing down the OMF capital investment.

9. Report of the Nomination Committee (Bettina Arnold, NC member)

The NC made recommendations to the EAA Executive Board to improve nomination and election process. Discussion with the EAA Officers and Executive Board are ongoing and members will be informed about any proposals for changes to be made in due course.

10. Election results (Karen Waugh, EAA Secretary)

According to the Statutes the EAA Executive Board consists of 10 elected members: 3 Officers, an Incoming President elected one year before the term of office, and 6 Ordinary Members (one of them appointed as a Vice-President). This year, the posts of two Ordinary members of the Executive Board become vacant. The period of service is 3 years and the elected candidates will serve from 2018 to 2021. The EAA Nomination Committee consists of 3 elected members, one retiring each year; the period of service is 3 years. The candidate elected to the Nomination Committee will serve from 2018 to 2021.

Following the deadline for nominations by members on 10 April, 5 nominations were received for the positions of Ordinary Executive Board member. The Nomination Committee (composed of Margarita Díaz-Andreu, Bettina Arnold and John Robb) met on 14 April to consider the validity of these nominations.

Personalised election instructions were circulated via e-mail on 9 August when on-line election opened. The 525 valid votes (429 received on-line, 96 at the conference ballot box) were counted by EAA Secretary Karen Waugh, Nomination Committee Members Margarita Díaz-Andreu and Bettina Arnold, and EAA Administrator Sylvie Květinová. The elected candidates are shown in bold below.

EXECUTIVE BOARD MEMBER 1 

Høst-Madsen, Lene

172 received votes

Mikkola, Esa

122 received votes

Zilinskaite, Agne

205 received votes

 

26 abstained


EXECUTIVE BOARD MEMBER 2

Fernández-Götz, Manuel

223 received votes

Riede, Felix

175 received votes

Gutsmiedl-Schümann, Doris

111 received votes

 

16 abstained

NOMINATION COMMITTEE MEMBER

Guermandi, Maria Pia

201 received votes

Mařík, Jan

115 received votes

Yalman, Nurcan Emine

176 received votes

 

33 abstained


The EAA Secretary expressed appreciation to both successful and unsuccessful candidates and thanked in particular the outgoing Executive Board and Committee Members for their service over the last three years: Esa Mikkola, Gitte Hansen and Margarita Díaz-Andreu. Whilst the Statutes do not insist on a quorum for electoral purposes, the EAA is aware that the 525 valid votes are still not sufficiently representative of the total EAA membership.

11. New appointments

The following positions became vacant in 2018, and the below appointments and re-appointments were approved:

  • TEA Editors:
    • Katharina Rebay-Salisbury (re-appointed)
    • Rod Salisbury (re-appointed)
  • Incoming EJA Editor (Robin Skeates continues as EJA Editor until 2019):
    • Cate Frieman
  • EJA Editorial Board
    • Ekaterina Dolbunova (re-appointed)
  • Heritage Prize Committee
    • Katalin Wolak (re-appointed)
    • Franco Nicolis (re-appointed)
  • Oscar Montelius Foundation
    • Peter Biehl (re-appointed)
  • Statutes Committee
    • Harald Hermansen (re-appointed)
12. EAA Publication reports

Robin Skeates, the EJA Editor, thanked the EJA Editorial Board and the CUP for a flawless cooperation. The EJA receives an increasing number of contributions, but has a 57% rejection rate (all rejected authors receive detailed feedback). EJA ethics policy is under preparation, and will be shared with members when ready. Cate Frieman, appointed as Incoming EJA Editor in 2018 – 2019, will be the first female EJA Editor and will surely do an excellent job.

THEMES in Contemporary Archaeology are edited by Kristian Kristiansen, Eszter Bánffy and Peter Attema. Sales figures are not very positive, and members are urged to request their institution’s libraries to purchase copies. A new publisher is being sought for THEMES.

Roderick Salisbury, TEA Editor, urged members to send contributions to TEA before the 15 October deadline.

New series Elements: The Archaeology of Europe, published by CUP, will be edited by M. Fernandez-Götz and Bettina Arnold, appointed following a public tender. Authors of 38 planned volumes to be published until 2022 have been selected, but the CUP welcomes proposals for further Elements series. Members will be eligible for reduced price of Elements.

13. EAA communities

Wednesday of the Annual Meeting week has established itself as the “communities’ day”.

New communities include:

  • Archaeology of Wild Plants
  • Climate Change and Heritage (CCH)
  • Palaeolithic and Mesolithic Archaeology (PaM)
  • Urban Archaeology

Members are welcome to suggest new communities and subscribe to the existing ones through EAA web page.

14. Location of future Annual Meetings

Future Annual Meetings will be held in:

  • 2019 Bern, Switzerland
  • 2020 Budapest, Hungary
  • 2021 Kiel, Germany

A strong bid has been received from Belfast, to be approved by the Executive Board for 2022, and interesting preliminary bids have been submitted for 2023. The EAA continues to welcome any serious offers made to organise future EAA Annual Meetings.

15. Announcement of the 25th EAA Annual Meeting

Albert Hafner was honoured to invite all members to Bern 2019 25th EAA Annual Meeting. Amelie Alterauge will be the Annual Meeting manager. The Meeting will be held in Bern old town, a UNESCO site. The venue will be the Bern University Main building and UniS, but in case of a large attendance there are other building in reserve. There is also the possibility of an extra muro session in Latenium. The Opening Ceremony will be held in the French Church, the Annual Party at Bierhübeli and the Annual Dinner at the Gurten.

The logo reflects the iconic mountains surrounding Bern but also the passes in the mountains that take us beyond paradigms. The six Annual Meeting themes include:

  • Archaeological theory and methods beyond paradigms
  • Interpreting the archaeological record: artefacts, humans, and landscapes
  • Archaeology of mountainous landscapes
  • Digital archaeology, science and multidisciplinarity: new methods, new challenges
  • Archaeological heritage and museum management: future chances, future risks
  • Global change and archaeology

Delegates are encouraged to travel to Bern by train, and discouraged to travel by car. There are 3 major airports within 1 hour travel. Accommodation has been pre-booked in hotels at cheaper prices, but early booking is strongly recommended.

The European Society for Astronomy in Culture will also hold their conference within the EAA Annual Meeting in Bern, which will contribute to the attendance numbers and programme of sessions.

16. 25th Anniversary of the foundation of EAA

The first EAA meeting was held in Ljubljana in 1994. Anniversary activities will be announced to members, and everybody is welcome to suggest activities. EAA should use the anniversary to reflect the past and look to the future.

17. Any Other Business

Since there was no other business, the meeting was closed.

Go back to top

Meeting with EAA corporate members

7 September 2018

List of EAA corporate members in 2018
  • ASHA - Archaeological Service Agency (Albania)
  • Association of Lithuanian Archaeology
  • AU - Institute of Archaeology of the Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic
  • HES Historic Environment Scotland
  • INRAP - National Institute for Preventive Archaeological Research (France)
  • Institut fuer Ur- und Fruehgeschichte Kiel (Germany)
  • Institute of Archaeology Russian Academy of Sciences
  • Museum of Cultural History University of Oslo (Norway)
  • NIKU - Norwegian Institute for Cultural Heritage Research
  • OCW - Cultural Heritage Inspectorate (The Netherlands)
  • Prehistoric Society (UK)
  • RGK (Germany)
  • Salisbury Régészeti Kft (Hungary)
EAA Corporate Members’ Benefits

EAA wants to encourage its corporate members to become more engaged in EAA life – current corporate members were asked for innovative ideas to bolster their engagement. Reactions included:

  • Foster visibility of EAA corporate members
  • Offer discounts on exhibition stands of EAA corporate members at European Archaeology Fair (EAF)
  • Corporate members could be able to label sessions at Annual Meetings, if they wish to do so.
  • If the number of free individual members allowed for each corporate membership were to be used for students, the number of free memberships could be increased, and this would be welcome by the existing corporate members (the number of individual members allowed per corporate member is at the moment based on a full member fee. If this was turned into a financial equivalent, student fees are cheaper, which would allow more members for the same financial equivalent).
  • However, the cost of Annual Meeting participation is still considered prohibitive for students – EAA asked to reconsider student rates.
  • EAA is considering a new membership category for young professionals (probably equivalent to student fees)
  • Oscar Montelius Foundation has provided travel grants to 40 delegates this year. It is hoped to continue this provision in the coming years to help students and low-income professionals to cover the costs of coming to an Annual Meeting.
  • Individual corporate memberships can be used to extend the institutional networks by offering the individual corporate membership also to external co-operators.
  • Corporate registration for Annual Meeting should be possible (collective rather than individual payment).
  • Corporate members are asked to advise EAA about fundraising.

Comments / views are welcome at helpdesk@e-a-a.org.


Meeting with corporate members. Photo: Katka Kleinová

Go back to top

World Bank Highlights Cultural Heritage in its new Environmental and Social Framework

by Colin Scott, Environment and Social Framework, The World Bank (cscott@worldbank.org)

The World Bank has long recognized that its projects, especially those with a physical footprint, can have inadvertent but adverse impacts on tangible and intangible cultural heritage. In July 2006, a safeguard policy on physical cultural resources was implemented to address such risks. With the advent of the Bank’s new Environmental and Social Framework, those provisions have been strengthened into a stand-alone Standard on Cultural Heritage that covers heritage of all types. Beyond this effort to balance heritage preservation with economic development, the Bank has increasingly supported projects that proactively promote the responsible and productive use of cultural heritage. The President’s Forum at the EAA Annual Meeting in Barcelona, organised by EAA President Felipe Criado-Boado, was entitled “International Cooperation in Archaeology and Heritage and the World Bank’s Engagement in Cultural Heritage Management” (session 797). The session, led by Afshan Khawaja and Colin Scott from the World Bank’s Operational Policy and Country Services unit, explored the risks and opportunities for the Bank’s increased engagement in this area.

In August 2016, the World Bank’s Board of Executive Directors approved the Environmental and Social Framework (ESF). The ESF protects people and the environment from potential adverse impacts that could arise from Bank-financed projects, and promotes sustainable development. This new framework provides broad coverage, including important advances on transparency, non-discrimination, social inclusion, public participation and accountability. The ESF also places more emphasis on building borrower governments’ own capacity to deal with environmental and social issues. A new standard on cultural heritage expands the Bank’s protections in an area that it has long recognized as an important part of sustainable development.

What are the key changes?

The scope of social issues has been broadened to include specific reference to occupational health and safety, labor and working conditions, community health and safety, and human security in the context of conflicts or crime. The ESF enhances requirements for transparency and stakeholder engagement. These requirements can now be found throughout the ESF. The ESF also includes non-discrimination provisions against disadvantaged or vulnerable individuals or groups. In addition, a separate new mandatory World Bank Directive, which sets out examples of these groups, requires staff to assist Borrowers to consider, mitigate, and manage potential discrimination issues.

The ESF also highlights additional environmental issues, for example the estimation of project greenhouse gas emissions, the sustainable management of living natural resources, and water management. Cultural Heritage spans both social and environmental protections and objectives. The new standard on cultural heritage recognizes the importance of intangible cultural heritage as well as updating important provisions on chance finds, consultation with local communities and the use of cultural heritage management plans in project implementation.

How is the new Environmental and Social Framework an improvement?

The ESF is a strong and comprehensive package that sets a high standard in terms of scope and breadth. It brings the World Bank’s environmental and social protections in line with those of other development institutions, and makes advances in important areas. It includes comprehensive protection for workers, communities and disadvantaged or vulnerable groups. By considering a greater range of environmental and social risks and potential impacts, including cultural heritage, the ESF will promote better – and lasting – development outcomes.

How will the ESF help Borrowers with their own environmental and social frameworks?

Strengthening national systems in borrowing countries is recognized as a central development goal in international agreements endorsed by the World Bank and most of its shareholders, such as the Paris Declaration, the Accra Agenda for Action, and the Busan Partnership for Effective Development Cooperation. In line with this, the ESF places greater emphasis on the use of Borrower frameworks, with the goal of building sustainable Borrower institutions and increasing efficiency. Under the ESF, all or part of a Borrower environmental and social framework may be used for a project when it is determined that using the Borrower framework will address the risks and impacts of the project and will lead to outcomes consistent with the objectives of the ESF.

What is the timeline for the implementation of the ESF?

An intensive preparation and training period is now under way to pave the way for the introduction of the new framework. Preparation focuses on: training World Bank staff and Borrowers to implement the framework; strengthening the World Bank’s environmental and social risk management system; supporting and strengthening the capacity of Borrowers; developing directives, procedures, and guidance; and strengthening strategic partnerships with our development partners. The preparation period will take place over the next year and a half. If needed, the time will be extended to ensure all elements are in place for the launch of the ESF. A set of readiness indicators are being put in place to monitor progress towards the effective date. The ESF will go into effect on October 1, 2018, and will progressively replace the Bank’s Safeguards.


President's Forum: International cooperation in archaeology and heritage and the World's Bank engagement in cultural heritage management. Photo Alejandro García

Go back to top

Archaeology and gender in Europe (AGE)

Community of the European Association of Archaeologists - Report

by Uroš Matić (urosmatic@uni-muenster.de)

The AGE community held its business meeting on Wednesday, 5 September 2018, at the Annual Meeting of European Association of Archaeologists in Barcelona.

Co-chairs, Nancy L. Wicker, Prof., Department of Art and Art History of The University of Mississipi (USA) presided at the meeting with the assistance of Uroš Matić, Ma, Dr. des, research associate at the Institute for Egyptology and Coptic Studies of the University of Muenster (Germany).

At the meeting it was announced that Nancy L. Wicker, who has been a co-chair since 2015 to 2018, finished her mandate and that a new co-chair, Laura Coltofean, curator at the Brukenthal National Museum in Sibiu (Romania), has been elected. AGE would like to thank Nancy L. Wicker for her work as a co-chair and enormous effort in running AGE community in the period of growing number of members (currently 95) and AGE activities.

At the AGE meeting several topics were discussed. The issue of sexual harassment in archaeology was discussed inspired by numerous posters in Spanish and English which could be found at the venue of the EAA Annual Meeting in Barcelona. These posters are the result of the research on sexual harassment in archaeology in Spain conducted by the group "Arqueólogas Feministas". AGE recognizes this as not solely a local problem and initiatives on raising awareness to this issue are on their way.

AGE would like to say farewell to Ericka Engelstad (1947-2018), professor at the Institute for archaeology and social anthropology at the University of Tromsø, who sadly passed away on July 17th 2018. Engelstad obtained her Ph.D from the University of Wisconsin-Madison in USA in 1980. She has been working in the museum in Tromsø since 1981 and at the Faculty of Social Sciences since 1991. She was appointed with honorary doctorate at Uppsala University in 2006 and at Gothenburg University in 2012. She had a guest professorship at the universities of Cambridge, Berkeley and Uppsala. Her primary research field was Stone Age archaeology with emphasis on rock art. Engelstad participated in excavations and research projects in Finnmark (Alta-Kautokeinovassdraget, Iversfjord), Tysfjord, Karelia and South Africa. She is perhaps most widely known for her early and pointed critique of post-processualists for their ignorance (or exclusion) of feminist perspectives, published in Antiquity (vol. 65, 1991). She was an editor of Norwegian Archaeological Review from 1991 until 2001, and of KAN — Kvinner i Arkeologi Norge (Women in Archaeology in Norway) 1992–1995. AGE would like to remind EAA of the life and work of Ericka Engelstad.

The annual AGE session at the EAA under the title “Gender and Colonialism” was organised by Sandra Montón-Subías, Beatríz Marin-Aguilera and Leila Papoli-Yazdi on September 6th. The session included 10 papers given by authors from Spain, Germany, UK, Basque country and the Netherlands. It covered various case studies including New Kingdom Egypt and Nubia, Talayotic societies on Balearic islands, Sancti Spiritu in Argentina in 16th century, Guam in west Pacific in late 17th century, Reche-Mapuche communities of colonial Chile from 16th to 19th century, northeast Catalonia from 5th to 4th century BC, La Tortuga island of Venezuela in 18th century and Monte Alban, Oaxaca in Mexico. The session demonstrated the necessity of including gender in archaeological analysis of colonialism, a concern already recognized by postcolonial and decolonial scholars like for example Maria Lugones, but rarely recognized by archaeologists. Unfortunately Leila Papoli-Yazdi could not participate the session and the EAA Annual meeting due to the growing difficulties for Iranian scholars to obtain funding, permissions and visas to participate international conferences. Papoli-Yazdi sent a letter addressing the participants. This issue was recognized at the AGE business meeting too and we are currently working on finding solutions to include colleagues who cannot attend AGE activities by using Skype calls or conferences.

AGE congratulates to the organizers of the EAA Annual Meeting in Barcelona on their effort to achieve gender balance in key note speakers.

The publication of the AGE session at the EAA Annual Meeting in Maastricht 2017, titled “Beautiful bodies: Gender, bodily care and material culture in the past”, is in preparation with expected date of publishing being in spring 2019.

AGE community invites other EAA members to join the community and current AGE members to consider organizing a session on archaeology of gender and to submit their proposal to AGE for an official AGE supported session.

Go back to top

Public Archaeology in the EAA

by Camille Westmont (vcwestmont@gmail.com) and Francesca Benetti (francescabenetti@live.it)

As the newly elected co-chairs of the Public Archaeology Community of the EAA, we are excited to take up the challenge of reinvigorating discussions and collaborations on public archaeology within the EAA community. Established in 2013, the Community seeks to provide an international network for public archaeology that communicates across the discipline given the increased interest in and importance of collaborating with various publics.

The aims of the Public Archaeology Community, as recently redrafted, are:

  • to raise the profile of Public Archaeology within the EAA by organising sessions related to public archaeology during Annual Meetings and by participating with public archaeology papers in other sessions;
  • to do political lobbying as a way to highlight the need to include clear policies in favour of public archaeology as we observe the tendency to make legal changes across Europe which would result in the lack of public participation;
  • to have theoretical debates in sessions, (co-)organised by the Public Archaeology Community, while using the Community meetings primarily for organisational issues;
  • to act as a platform to share information about ongoing projects, especially in Europe. Many projects across Europe seek to address similar challenges, but unfortunately often do not collaborate. Therefore, the Public Archaeology Community aims to help by creating synergies between them;
  • to coordinate with other EAA Communities. As we acknowledge the interdisciplinary nature of Public Archaeology, collaborating with other Communities will be essential to promoting shared policies and practices.

We encourage interested parties (as well as members of the general public) to join our listserve to stay updated on Community activities and in touch with other public archaeologists working in Europe. We also encourage you to visit our updated Public Archaeology Community page.

As the new leaders of this group, we hope to take it in a new direction. We aim to establish a network of professionals in order to enhance communication while being a resource for best practices, innovation, and assistance. We will establish a crowd-sourced library of resources related to public archaeology that will be available to community members. We will keep in contact with the communities and provide members with a venue for keeping in contact with each other through the use of the community listserve. We will reestablish the Public Archaeology Community-sponsored sessions at the EAA Annual Meeting as well as informal gatherings during the conference.

We look forward to working with you to strengthen the profile of public archaeology within the EAA in the coming years. Please feel welcome to reach out to us with any comments or suggestions.

Go back to top